-
Recent Posts
- Durable Medical Equipment Companies to Pay Millions in False Claims Settlement
- Warner Chilcott Pharmaceutical Company to Pay $125 Million in Qui Tam/Criminal Settlement
- Judge Bifurcates Trial in Alabama Qui Tam Whistleblower Hospice Fraud Suit Against Aseracare
- Federal Lacey Act Wildlife Trafficking Conviction – Illegally Selling Turtles in South Carolina
- Contraband Cigarette Federal Indictment Nabs South Carolina Men
Recent Comments
Joe Griffith 2 on South Carolina’s McLeod… Carl and Marina Schl… on South Carolina’s McLeod… Archives
Categories
- Aiding and Abetting
- Ambulance Fraud
- Bank Fraud
- Bankruptcy Fraud
- Bond Fraud
- Bribery
- Child Pornography
- Clinic Fraud
- Counterfeiting
- Criminal Conspiracy
- Criminal Defense Lawyer
- Criminal Law
- Criminal Law – Tax Evasion
- Criminal Resource Manual – DOJ
- Defense Contractor Fraud
- Department of Justice
- Downward Departure/Variance
- Downward Departures
- Durable Medical Equipment Fraud
- Election/Campaign Law Crimes
- Embezzlement
- Environmental Crimes
- ERISA/MEWA Crimes
- Espionage/Sedition
- Extortion
- False Claims Act
- False Statements/False Reports
- Foreign Corrupt Trade Practices
- Forfeiture
- Fraud
- Gaming/Gambling Crimes
- Government Fraud
- Grand Jury – Federal
- Grand Jury – SC Statewide
- Health Care Fraud
- Hedge Fund Fraud
- High Profile Prosecutions
- Hospice Fraud
- Hospital Fraud
- Immigration
- Insurance Fraud
- Internal Investigaions
- International Crimes
- Internet Fraud
- Investment Fraud
- Lacey Act
- Mail Fraud
- Medicaid Fraud
- Medicare Fraud
- Money Laundering
- Mortgage Fraud SC
- Nursing Home Fraud SC
- Obstruction of Justice
- Pardons
- Passport Fraud
- Perjury
- Pharmacy/Pharmaceutical Fraud
- Pretrial Diversion
- Public Corruption
- Qui Tam-Whistleblower
- RICO
- SC Attorney General
- SC Department of Revenue
- SC Qui Tam Attorney
- SC Solicitors
- SC Whistleblower Lawyer
- Securities Fraud
- Securities Fraud Whistleblower
- Sentencing Guidelines
- South Carolina Attorney
- South Carolina Criminal Defense Lawyer
- South Carolina Fraud Lawyer
- South Carolina Law Firm
- South Carolina Lawyer
- Structuring
- Target Letters/Subject Letters
- TARP Fraud
- Tax Fraud
- U.S. Attorney
- U.S. Attorney's Manual
- Uncategorized
- White Collar Crimes
- Wire Fraud
Meta
Tag Archives: Rule 10b-5
SEC Charges Goldman Sachs With Securities Fraud in Structuring and Marketing of CDO Tied to Subprime Mortgages
“The product was new and complex but the deception and conflicts are old and simple,” said Robert Khuzami, Director of the Division of Enforcement. “Goldman wrongly permitted a client that was betting against the mortgage market to heavily influence which mortgage securities to include in an investment portfolio, while telling other investors that the securities were selected by an independent, objective third party.”
Kenneth Lench, Chief of the SEC’s Structured and New Products Unit, added, “The SEC continues to investigate the practices of investment banks and others involved in the securitization of complex financial products tied to the U.S. housing market as it was beginning to show signs of distress.”
The SEC alleges that one of the world’s largest hedge funds, Paulson & Co., paid Goldman Sachs to structure a transaction in which Paulson & Co. could take short positions against mortgage securities chosen by Paulson & Co. based on a belief that the securities would experience credit events.
Posted in Criminal Defense Lawyer, Criminal Law, Department of Justice, Fraud, High Profile Prosecutions, Investment Fraud, Securities Fraud, South Carolina Attorney, South Carolina Criminal Defense Lawyer, South Carolina Fraud Lawyer, South Carolina Law Firm, South Carolina Lawyer, U.S. Attorney, White Collar Crimes
Tagged abacus, attorney, CDO, collateralized debt obligation, digorgement of profits, Fabrice Tourre, Goldman Sachs, inunctive relief, law firm, lawyer, mortgage backed securities, Paulson and Company, penalties, Rule 10b-5, sc, sc securities fraud lawyer, sec, securities and exchange, securities fraud, south carolina, synthetic derivatives
Leave a comment
Telemarketers Convicted of Securities Fraud in Telemarketing Schemes to Defraud Investors
Under 9th Circuit jurisprudence, willfully as used in Section 77ff(a) does not require that a defendant specifically know that his conduct was unlawful, and the trial court’s erroneous instruction was harmless. The court further held that a defendant’s reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of a misrepresentation can also be considered “willfull” under the securities fraud statute. The court further found that there was no error in failing to provide the jury a “puffing” instruction because the trial court had instructed that jury that good faith constituted a complete defense. Continue reading
Posted in Criminal Defense Lawyer, Criminal Law, Fraud, Securities Fraud, Sentencing Guidelines, U.S. Attorney, White Collar Crimes
Tagged 18 U.S.C. 78ff, 18 U.S.C. 78j, attorney, crime, criminal, criminal defense, criminal law, criminal lawyer, doj, Everett Koop, FBI, FDA, fraud, indictment, IPO, law firm, lawyer, mail fraud, promissory notes, prosecution, Rule 10b-5, sc, sec, securities and exchange commission, securities fraud, sentence, sentencing, south carolina, telemarketers, telemarketing, Tom Brokaw, U.S. Attorney, white collar
Leave a comment
Day Trader Convicted of Federal Securities Fraud Involving Manipulations of Lucent Corporation Stock with Fraudulent Chat Room Press Releases
Defendant Moldofsky was an on-line “day trader” of stocks. On March 22, 2002, he began posting anonymous messages on an internet website message board regarding Lucent Corporation stock. All of his messages were false and generally stated that Lucent was about to issue public earnings warnings due to deteriorating business conditions. Lucent stock traded significantly lower on the morning of March 23, 2002, until such time as Lucent issued a press release stating that Moldofsky’s chat room messages were fake and incorrect. Upon Lucent’s press release, its stock price rose significantly. Moldofsky was convicted at trial for violating the 1934 Act, to wit, 18 U.S.C. §§ 78ff(a) and 78j(b) and Rule 10b-5. During the trial, he had moved the court for a jury instruction stating that the the jury was required to find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not know of the Rule 10b-5. The court denied the motion, noting that the No Knowledge Clause might be relevant when it came to sentencing, but that it was not an element of the offense for the jury’s consideration. The court later denied the defendant’s motion for a sentence of no imprisonment, finding that the defendant, an experienced day-trader, had admitted that he knew there were rules against fraud and manipulation of stocks. Continue reading
Posted in Criminal Defense Lawyer, Criminal Law, Fraud, Securities Fraud, U.S. Attorney, White Collar Crimes
Tagged 18 U.S.C. 78ff, attorney, chat room, crime, criminal, criminal defense, criminal law, criminal lawyer, day trader, fraud, law firm, lawyer, Lucent Corporation, no knowledge clause, prosecution, Rule 10b-5, sc, sec, securities and exchange commission, securities fraud, sentencing, south carolina, stock manipulation, U.S. Attorney, white collar
Leave a comment
Federal Criminal Securities Fraud Provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 for SC Lawyers, SC Attorneys and SC Law Firms
The 1934 Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”) generally regulates trading of securities after their distribution through initial public offerings. Some of the provisions of the 1934 Act also regulate initial public offerings. It is codified at 15 U.S.C. §§ 78a through 78mm. The criminal provisions of the statute, 15 U.S.C. § 78ff, provide as follows:
(a) Willful violations; false and misleading statements
Posted in Fraud, Government Fraud, Securities Fraud, U.S. Attorney, White Collar Crimes
Tagged 15 U.S.C. 78ff, 15 U.S.C. 78j, 1934 Act, attorney, crime, fraud, law firm, lawyer, Rule 10b-5, sc, sec, securities and exchange commission, securities fraud, securities fraud lawyer, securities law, south carolina, U.S. Attorney
Leave a comment